The Architecture Decision I Regretted Only After We Went Live
At the time, the decision made sense.
It simplified the system. Reduced coordination. Helped us ship faster. Everyone agreed it was “good enough for now.”
Production changed that perspective.
Why It Didn’t Feel Risky at First
Traffic was low. Failure was rare. The system behaved politely.
The architecture wasn’t wrong, it was untested.
I mistook early stability for correctness.
The First Signs I Ignored
Small issues appeared:
-
Manual restarts
-
Edge-case inconsistencies
-
“Rare” retries that weren’t rare anymore
Each one felt manageable. None felt urgent.
Together, they were a warning.
When Change Became Expensive
Once users depended on the system:
-
Refactors became risky
-
Downtime had real cost
-
Workarounds replaced fixes
The decision I made early quietly limited every future choice.
What That Experience Taught Me
Now, I assume:
-
Every shortcut will be stressed
-
Every assumption will be violated
-
Every design choice has a production cost
The goal isn’t perfect architecture.
It’s architecture that can survive being wrong.
Why I’m Sharing This
Most architectural mistakes only become obvious after it’s too late.
This was one of mine.
— Peesh Chopra
Read more: The Day Our Rollup Framework Broke Under Live Traffic - My Honest Story
Comments
Post a Comment